# How AgenticWebScore compares with Cloudflare and Lighthouse > How AgenticWebScore compares with Cloudflare’s agent readiness check, Lighthouse, and 5 other tools, from their public pages as read on 13 October 2026. - Source: /compare - Site: AgenticWebScore - Language: English --- This page sets AgenticWebScore beside 7 other products that check whether a site is ready for agents. Each fact about them was read from their public pages on 13 October 2026, and every row names its page. ## The comparison A cell reads “Not stated” where the product’s own page does not give the fact. _Facts about AgenticWebScore are read from this site. Facts about the other products are as read on 13 October 2026._ | Product | Checks | Output | Method | API or MCP | Price and account | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | AgenticWebScore | 61 checks in 5 dimensions, under rubric v0.7. | A score, a grade, a level, the evidence for each check, and a change and a command for each check to fix. | The rubric, the weights, the grade bands, and the level rules are public and versioned. Each record has a fingerprint. | A JSON API and an MCP server with 4 tools. | Free. No account. | [Methodology](/methodology) | | Cloudflare, isitagentready.com | 21 checks, mostly on draft standards. | A prompt to paste into a coding agent. The page says the prompt can contain errors. | Each check links to a standard. The page states no scale and no weights. | An MCP server with a `scan_site` tool, a URL Scanner API, and Radar data. | Not stated; the page shows no charge. No account. | [isitagentready.com](https://isitagentready.com) | | Lighthouse, agentic browsing audits | About 4 areas: WebMCP, llms.txt, accessibility for agents, and layout shift (CLS). | Pass or fail for each audit. The page states no fix output. | Open source. The page states no formula and no weights. It runs on your own machine, so you can repeat a result. | None stated on the page. | Free. No account, except a trial program for WebMCP. | [Chrome for Developers](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/agentic-browsing) | | GEO Optimizer (open source) | 9 categories, 27 user agents, and 47 content checks. | A `geo fix` command shows a preview, then writes files. | MIT licence. It runs on your own machine. | A command line, Python, a GitHub Action, and 12 MCP tools. | Free. A hosted plan starts at $19 a month. No account. | [GitHub, Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skill](https://github.com/Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skill) | | GEO Toolbox | Access for 34 user agents under 6 browser identities, with pages rendered in a real browser. The page states no number of checks. | Fixes for the most serious problems. | The page publishes no rubric. | Not stated. | Free, with a limit for each IP address. It points to a paid platform. No account. | [geotoolbox.ai](https://geotoolbox.ai/tools/agent-readiness-scanner) | | LLM Pulse | About 19 signals in 4 dimensions. | A prioritised list, each item linked to a standard. | It shows the evidence for each signal. The page states no weights. | None stated. | Free. A business email address is required. | [llmpulse.ai](https://llmpulse.ai/agent-readiness-checker) | | Frase | 10 checks. | A short guide. The full report needs a trial. | The page shows score bands and no method. | Not stated. | The score is free. The full report is a 7-day trial, with plans from $39 a month. The report needs a sign-up. | [frase.io](https://www.frase.io/tools/agent-readiness) | | Apify, Agent-Readiness actor | 5 signals with published weights. | A list of what is missing. The page states no fixes. | Weights and thresholds are published. It checks that a file exists, not how good it is. | An API and the Apify MCP server. | Priced by use; the page states no price. An Apify account and a token are needed. | [Apify](https://apify.com/petteridev/agent-readiness-checker) | > Products change. A row is true of the page on the day it was read, and can change after 13 October 2026. Read the source before you rely on a row. If one is out of date or wrong, write to hello@agenticwebscore.com. ## Where each fits Use Cloudflare’s check or Lighthouse together with this site. They answer different questions, and a result that differs between them is a place to read the check page. Cloudflare’s check links each of its checks to a standard and gives you a prompt for a coding agent. This site publishes its scale and its weights, so a score can be recomputed. Lighthouse runs in a browser on one page at a time, and you can run it on your own machine. This site reads what a plain HTTP client receives, from the paths the rubric names. ### What this site does not do - It does not run JavaScript. It reads what a plain HTTP client receives, so a homepage whose HTML holds almost no readable text is reported as not measured. - It does not monitor your site. A scan runs when somebody asks for one, and a stored record younger than 6 hours is reused. There are no alerts and no history chart. - It does not fix anything. It gives the change to make and a command that repeats the measurement, and you or your agent writes the file. ## What is different here Each point below can be checked on this site. - The rubric is public and versioned. [The methodology](/methodology) lists all 61 checks, their weights, the grade bands, the level rules, and what changed in each version. The current version is v0.7. - Every check has a command. Each page under [/checks](/checks) gives a shell command that repeats the measurement, so you can compare your result with the scanner’s. - Every scan record has a fingerprint. `/verify/` recomputes it from the host, the rubric version, and the outcome of every check. It reports a mismatch as tamper evidence. - A site the scanner cannot read is not measured. It gets no score, not a low one, and the report says why. - The API and the MCP server need no account. `/api/scan` returns the full scan record as JSON, described in [OpenAPI](/openapi.json). The MCP server at `/mcp` has 4 tools: `scan_site`, `get_score`, `list_checks`, and `get_report`.